Hi I added information of customer performance result in the latest version. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-03#appendix-A.3 It would be reference for assumption of traffic between 6rd server and 6rd server.
Regarads, -Shishio (2011/07/25 11:25), Shishio Tsuchiya (shtsuchi) wrote: > Hui > I appreciate your comment. > Hui Deng wrote: > > Shishio > > Thanks for your explaination, just one more comment > > Server based solution will expereience bottleneck once the traffic grows > up? > > Regards, > > In current datacenter services,user can select type of service by expected > traffic. > traffic is small-VPS->Dedicated Server->Housing Service--traffic is huge > > In housing service,router based 6rd CE would be fine. > If user would select this architecture,user also can use some native IPv6 > technics such as loadbalancing. > > I mensioned on section-2. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-00#section-2 > -For Housing users, there are two options. Either the 6rd CE > function is performed on the Gateway router itself, or the servers themselves > can run 6rd directly. > > But I felt it need more detail description. > The former is for huge performance request users. > The later is for IPv6 small start users who not needs server load balancer. > > Regards, > -Shishio > > > > -Hui > > 2011/7/22 Shishio Tsuchiya <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > Hui > > Thanks for your comment. > > > > Hui Deng wrote: > > > Hello authors, > > > > > > Just wondering how you handle those issues which were mentioned in the > draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-01 > > > for example, > > > 1) have you supported Ipv4 any cast? > > > > I'm not sure what is issue in comcast case yet. > > But Sakura is not using IPv4 anycast for 6rd BR now. > > > > > 2) implemented DHCPv4 options? > > We mentioned about this. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-4.2 > > The server-based 6rd does not needs automatic configuration because the > server usually configure IPv4 address statically. > > > > > 3) the number of implementations? > > Many OS already supported 6rd feature. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-3 > > > > > > > 4) Data center normally has high end routers and switches, would that > possible to deploy 6rd CE without any influences of performance? you may > deployed it on the server? > > > > In Sakura's case,switches has high performance for IPv4 switching,but IPv6 > switching poor or not support. > > To provide IPv6 internet without any influence of existing service,Sakura > is providing information of server-based 6rd to customers. > > > > Regards, > > -Shishio > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > -Hui > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
