On 30.01.2012 13:39, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote: > Yes. I support WG adoption (and carry on the discussion further). For what it is worth, I support WG adoption.
Cheers, Tomek MAP design team member, map-dhcp editor > On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Ole Trøan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hi, >> >> the MAP (Mapping of address and port) design team has now written and >> published the following sets of drafts. >> >> the base document (port mapping algorithm): >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03 >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03.txt >> >> the encapsulation document (MAP-E): >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-encapsulation-00 >> >> the translation document (MAP-T): >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-00 >> >> the DHCP option (MAP-DHCP): >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-02 >> >> there is a MAP deployment document coming soon. >> >> the solution described in this set of documents, are written to satisfy the >> following from the softwires charter: >> 4. Developments for stateless legacy IPv4 carried over IPv6 >> - develop a solution motivation document to be published as an RFC >> - develop a protocol specification response to the solution >> motivation document; this work item will not be taken through >> >> in the design team's view, this set of documents are ready to be adopted as >> working group documents. >> >> comments? >> >> for the MAP design team, >> Ole >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
