Hi Maoke, There are always trade-offs. We can suggest few options and ask the WG to choose one.
1) Let the host to reassemble the fragmented packets 2) Let the 4o6 TC to assemble the fragmented packets 3) Don¹t suggest anything and leave this open for implementation /Yiu From: Maoke <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:50:33 +0900 To: "Yiu L. LEE" <[email protected]> Cc: Qiong <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6 the "since we believe" is true in the term that client/server model is dominating the Internet usage. but the situation is changing, AFTR might suffer a heavy burden with reassembly in the environment where p2p is dominating. can we (actually you authors) surely state lightweight 4over6 improves this? if we can, it is a happy point. ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
