2012/2/16 Lee, Yiu <[email protected]> > Hi Maoke, > > There are always trade-offs. We can suggest few options and ask the WG to > choose one. >
good point. acceptable. :) - maoke > > 1) Let the host to reassemble the fragmented packets > 2) Let the 4o6 TC to assemble the fragmented packets > 3) Don’t suggest anything and leave this open for implementation > > /Yiu > > > From: Maoke <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:50:33 +0900 > To: "Yiu L. LEE" <[email protected]> > Cc: Qiong <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6 > > the "since we believe" is true in the term that client/server model is > dominating the Internet usage. but the situation is changing, AFTR might > suffer a heavy burden with reassembly in the environment where p2p is > dominating. can we (actually you authors) surely state lightweight 4over6 > improves this? if we can, it is a happy point. ;-) > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
