On Mar 6, 2012 3:56 AM, "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Cameron, > > > Is it the case that MAP deployments require DHCPv6 and therefore for > > mobile the solution is scoped only for 3GPP release 10 and beyond > > networks? > > MAP could be provisioned with whatever protocol you like. DHCPv6 is kind of the obvious one and the one IETF controls. > which one would fit best in a 3GPP environment? GTP (or DNS)? >
None come to mind. GTP with PCO might work, but I think it would end up being a lot of sdo heavy lifting to make that work and the timeline would be long. I am still unclear on how MAP works. Is it a /128 that the CE must use so that magic happens ? If so, I am not even sure that is scoped currently in 3gpp since the use case is pd with dhcpv6 For someone who wants MAP to work in 3gpp, the best path may be to hold out for dhcpv6 and make specific requirements on how the ue must source traffic from an address acquired from dhcpv6 when MAP is the transition solution. But, it may end up looking like a square peg pounded into a round hole. But, such is life in transition Cb On Mar 6, 2012 3:56 AM, "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]> wrote: > Cameron, > > > Is it the case that MAP deployments require DHCPv6 and therefore for > > mobile the solution is scoped only for 3GPP release 10 and beyond > > networks? > > MAP could be provisioned with whatever protocol you like. DHCPv6 is kind > of the obvious one and the one IETF controls. > which one would fit best in a 3GPP environment? GTP (or DNS)? > > cheers, > Ole
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
