Hi Cameron, With regard to DHCPv6 patch for Andorid, we have implemented one and have succeed in IPv6 trail for several CDMA phones including Moto XT800, ME811, etc. It is not so difficult : )
Best wishes Qiong On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Cameron Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2012 6:29 AM, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, Cameron, > > > > Le 2012-03-06 à 13:43, Cameron Byrne a écrit : > > > >> On Mar 6, 2012 3:56 AM, "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Cameron, > >> > > >> > > Is it the case that MAP deployments require DHCPv6 and therefore for > >> > > mobile the solution is scoped only for 3GPP release 10 and beyond > >> > > networks? > >> > > >> > MAP could be provisioned with whatever protocol you like. DHCPv6 is > kind of the obvious one and the one IETF controls. > >> > which one would fit best in a 3GPP environment? GTP (or DNS)? > >> > > >> > >> None come to mind. > >> > >> GTP with PCO might work, but I think it would end up being a lot of sdo > heavy lifting to make that work and the timeline would be long. > >> > >> I am still unclear on how MAP works. Is it a /128 that the CE must use > so that magic happens ? If so, I am not even sure that is scoped currently > in 3gpp since the use case is pd with dhcpv6 > >> > >> For someone who wants MAP to work in 3gpp, the best path may be to hold > out for dhcpv6 and make specific requirements on how the ue must source > traffic from an address acquired from dhcpv6 when MAP is the transition > solution. > >> > >> But, it may end up looking like a square peg pounded into a round > hole. But, such is life in transition > > > > Any idea why it would be so difficult to have DHVPv6 in Android phones, > noting that it would NOT imply support of many DHCPv6 options. > > > > I don't know. In 2012, it is not there yet in either the handsets or any > of the mobile infrastructure components, Afaik. > > Cb > > > In the context of your question, MAP options should be sufficient. > > (Note that the same comment applies to 4rd if retained as unified > standard, but this is a separate discussion.) > > > > RD > > > > > >> Cb > >> > >> On Mar 6, 2012 3:56 AM, "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Cameron, > >>> > >>> > Is it the case that MAP deployments require DHCPv6 and therefore for > >>> > mobile the solution is scoped only for 3GPP release 10 and beyond > >>> > networks? > >>> > >>> MAP could be provisioned with whatever protocol you like. DHCPv6 is > kind of the obvious one and the one IETF controls. > >>> which one would fit best in a 3GPP environment? GTP (or DNS)? > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> Ole > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Softwires mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
