On 4/1/12 3:24 AM, Fuyu (Eleven) wrote:
Agree. I think we shouldn't drop other stateless solutions as:
draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-05
draft-penno-softwire-sdnat-02
They are all belong to stateless scope and with the same network
architecture of IPv4 traffic across IPv6 access network as MAP and
4rd-U.
Please, don't make it even worse as it is now. Internet community
awaited the decision and clear recommendation for one stateless A+P
standard, we managed to narrow the selection down to two and we were not
able to decide at the end.
This results in some vendors deploying MAP combo, others 4RD-U and using
our inability to choose for their competitive fight.
For the sake of the Internet, don't bring back all the others, let's
consider and respect result of MAP team (even if that still brought us
two of them).
As I suggested during Friday Softwires WG, we *need* to decide ASAP.
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
