2012/4/9 Rémi Després <[email protected]> > > 2012-04-09 11:52, Maoke: > > 2012/4/9 Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> > >> Without any objection to MAP, we just start to coding 4rd-u and help to >> improve it. >> > > fine. we'd love to see it out with good amount of data and good amount of > feedback from testing operators. > > > > if you invite me to test, i'd love to provide challenging scenarios. > > > Providing such challenging scenarios to the WG will be welcome. > That's a way to make progress. >
thanks, Remi, for the encouragement. i think the first step is to clarify "what is needed to be ensured through the test". for this purpose, i made out an I-D (as i already posted to the wg), discussing the semantics issue of 4rd-U according to my understanding up to now. i think i wrote that as neutral as possible, and took my best effort in avoiding to write what i have not understood. if you (also others) find anything misunderstood, please don't hesitate to point out. thanks, maoke > Thanks, > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
