Hi Maoke,

Thank you for your efforts in technical details of one specific
proposal on the table.

However, I for one think that probably it is time to concentrate on
commonalities rather than the differences. As Alain indicated, these
proposals do have a lot of common points.

Why don't (whoever) write a draft putting together all the common
points concentrating on CE to BR and abstracting out BIH, XLAT, etc.?
Such a draft can be of great value at this point, I think.

Regards,

Behcet

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Maoke <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i made an internet-draft discussing the semantics issue of 4rd-U. comments,
> recommendations, technical discussions are welcome.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-softwire-4rd-u-comment-00
>
> thanks and regards,
> maoke
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <[email protected]>
> Date: 2012/4/10
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-chen-softwire-4rd-u-comment-00.txt
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-chen-softwire-4rd-u-comment-00.txt has been
> successfully submitted by Maoke Chen and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-chen-softwire-4rd-u-comment
> Revision:        00
> Title:           A Commentary on 4rd-U Architecture and Semantics
> Creation date:   2012-04-10
> WG ID:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 19
>
> Abstract:
>   4rd-U is proposed as an effort of unifying encapsulation and double
>   translation solutions for the softwire of IPv4 over IPv6 domain.
>   This attempt introduces new behaviors in the Internet transition
>   architecture as well as semantics other than that of well-known
>   Internet protocols.  This documents provides a commentary on the
>   semantic changes and their impacts.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to