===================================================================== Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, the other being published as experimental or informational. Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track. After carefully reading the documents and mailing list discussion, especially from this one: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg04135.html I understand MAP as a whole is two solutions， I fail to answer yes or no, It is Triple solutions, sorry, I couldn't convince myself to answer here.
If chair could kindly help to rephrase like "all of three" other than "both", then I may say "yes". ===================================================================== Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: 4rd-U or MAP? Same as above. ===================================================================== Best, -Hui 2012/4/5 Alain Durand <[email protected]> > Dear Softwire wg members: > > At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as > a whole) and > 4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one > solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should > make this > decision relatively quickly. > > During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question: > Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U? > We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP. > > The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like > to ask the same questions to the list. > > ===================================================================== > Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a > whole) on the standard track, > the other being published as experimental or informational. > Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as > standard track. > Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the > standard track. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: YES or NO > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ===================================================================== > > Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: > 4rd-U or MAP? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: 4rd-U or MAP > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ===================================================================== > > > > > Please fill out the following form and reply to the list > by Wednesday 4/10 5pm EDT. > > Note: Use this thread ONLY for expressing your support to > one OR the other, and redirect any discussions to other threads. > That would help up gauge consensus. > > Alain & Yong. > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
