> The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like
> to ask the same questions to the list.

As I can remind, this is not the same 'first' question as the one that
was asked on the Friday softwire meeting.  The question asked on
Friday was something like: "do you think we should make a
decision...".  The Friday audio archive is not online via
http://www.ietf.org/audio/ietf83/, but we can check later.

>
> =====================================================================
> Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a 
> whole) on the standard track,
> the other being published as experimental or informational.
> Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as 
> standard track.
> Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the 
> standard track.
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhen Cao, China Mobile, other options
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> =====================================================================
>
> Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track:
> 4rd-U or MAP?
>

Since this was to gauge consensus, I restate the one I voted on that Friday.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhen Cao, China Mobile, 4RD-U
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to