Hi Ole, On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Ole Trøan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I think we should still keep the initial feature of these solutions. > > all the proposed solutions, including DS-lite shares a large set of > commonalities. where the differences are more operational considerations > and deployment choices than technical differences. do we need a separate > protocol specification for each deployment choice? > I vote for describing the protocol specifications for different scenarios seperately. Although they have some commonalities, there are still quite a lot of differences from techincal details for their own features. As we currently have three categories of solutions, I think it will be easier and clearer for readers to understand each solution in seperated document. Best wishes Qiong > > cheers, > Ole > > > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
