Remi,

> Incidentally, while the WG draft on 4rd has been available since May 16, the 
> MAP specification, which was claimed in Paris to be well stabilized, already 
> tested, and urgent to be published, is still not available as a WG draft. I 
> therefore believe that discussing relationship between MAP and/or 4rd and 
> 4over6 would be more useful when an up-to-date MAP specification is available.

since you specifically bring it up.
the MAP draft was posted on June 1, and we are awaiting the softwire chairs to 
approve it as a -00 softwire document.

I expect they are busy as everyone else, but Alain promised to get to it today.

cheers,
Ole

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to