Hi Dapeng, I can't add the port restriction because stateless IPv4/IPv6 solutions (e.g., MAP, 4RD) support also the ability to assign a full IP address.
Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : liu dapeng [mailto:maxpass...@gmail.com] >Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2012 09:14 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP >Cc : softwires@ietf.org >Objet : Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: >draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt > >Hi Med, > >Thanks for posting this new version but I guess it doesn't reflect all >the discussion we had. I suggest to make following modifications. > >"States still should be maintained in other equipments, e.g. customer >premises equipment or host, in order to restrict port numbers within a >dedicated range." > >Please be undestood all the efforts are for precise expression >for the readers. > >Thanks, > >Best Regards, >Dapeng Liu > >2012/6/12, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>: >> Dear WG members, >> >> The new version includes the comments received during the WG LC (from >> Dapeng). >> >> A diff is available here: >> >> >http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-stateles s-4v6-motivation-02 >> >> Cheers, >> Med >> >> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : softwires-boun...@ietf.org >>>[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de >>>internet-dra...@ietf.org >>>Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2012 07:43 >>>À : i-d-annou...@ietf.org >>>Cc : softwires@ietf.org >>>Objet : [Softwires] I-D Action: >>>draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt >>> >>> >>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line >>>Internet-Drafts directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of >the IETF. >>> >>> Title : Motivations for Carrier-side >>>Stateless IPv4 over IPv6 Migration Solutions >>> Author(s) : Mohamed Boucadair >>> Satoru Matsushima >>> Yiu Lee >>> Olaf Bonness >>> Isabel Borges >>> Gang Chen >>> Filename : >>>draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-02.txt >>> Pages : 16 >>> Date : 2012-06-11 >>> >>>Abstract: >>> IPv4 service continuity is one of the most pressing problems that >>> must be resolved by Service Providers during the IPv6 transition >>> period - especially after the exhaustion of the public >IPv4 address >>> space. Current standardization effort that addresses IPv4 service >>> continuity focuses on stateful mechanisms. This document >elaborates >>> on the motivations for the need to undertake a companion effort to >>> specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6 approaches. >>> >>> >>> >>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-stateless- >>>4v6-motivation >>> >>>There's also a htmlized version available at: >>>http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-02 >>> >>>A diff from previous version is available at: >>>http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-stateles >>>s-4v6-motivation-02 >>> >>> >>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Softwires mailing list >>>Softwires@ietf.org >>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> Softwires@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> > > >-- > >------ >Best Regards, >Dapeng Liu > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
