> Ok, then we can make this more clear in our document. > > "States still should be maintained in other equipments, e.g. customer > premises equipment or host, in order to restrict IP address or port number > information into the configured context except that a non-shared IPv4 address > is > assigned to a standalone host."
I think this is just adding confusion. the NAT44 on the CPE already does this. I suggest we instead talk about no _additional_ state in the network. there is no need to mention the CPE, apart from stating that no additional state is required. cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
