Hi Satoru, On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Qiong, > > On 2012/06/25, at 15:06, Qiong wrote: > >> Hi Satoru, >> >> Would you please point out in which presentation in the Beijing Interim >> meeting illustrated "per-subscriber mapping" as one characteristic of MAP >> solution? I recall which xiaohong presented was a stateful one. > > Please find it out on page 14 from following url: > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/softwire-2.pdf
I think that's not what Alain meant. If you look back and forth a bit, you can see that: B1 stands for per-subscriber stateufl/mapping/binding... B2 stand for stateless Hub & Spoke (in MAP case, FMRs not provisoned to CE) B3 stand for stateless Mesh (in MAP case, FMRs provisoned to CE) The confusion comes from the use of per-subscriber in the slides. It's not the sementic we took in this thread. > > cheers, > --satoru > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
