On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peng, > > On 2012/06/25, at 17:37, Peng Wu wrote: > >>> Please find it out on page 14 from following url: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/softwire-2.pdf >> >> I think that's not what Alain meant. If you look back and forth a bit, >> you can see that: >> B1 stands for per-subscriber stateufl/mapping/binding... >> B2 stand for stateless Hub & Spoke (in MAP case, FMRs not provisoned to CE) >> B3 stand for stateless Mesh (in MAP case, FMRs provisoned to CE) >> The confusion comes from the use of per-subscriber in the slides. >> It's not the sementic we took in this thread. > > What's the differences from the semantics in this thread? > Since per-subscriber mapping operation should naturally be a hub-and-spoke > means, it is just a case of stateless solution operation.
The discussion in this thread falls in the case of B1. Not the slide you refered to (slide 14) at all. I sincely suggest you look into the slides again, or look at my summary in last mail, copied as following ============================================= B1 stands for per-subscriber stateufl/mapping/binding... B2 stand for stateless Hub & Spoke (in MAP case, FMRs not provisoned to CE) B3 stand for stateless Mesh (in MAP case, FMRs provisoned to CE) ============================================= > > cheers, > --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
