Hello all,

As I identified, there is no issue to apply ACL either on fix networks
or mobile networks. Why most operators don't have issue, why there is
the issue for special operator. What is the issue?

MAP-T and MAP-E have same address format. And, we have a good decision
to standard the MAP-E solution.

Even ACL is needed, MAP-E is sufficient. There is no need to create
another flavor

Considering above, MAP-T is superfluous.
I don't think we need spend much energy on that.
If there is something I missed, please kindly identify it before
submitting the MAP-T document.

Many thanks

Gang
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to