Hi, Suresh,

I did raise my hand for both questions back to Vancouver and it remains.

Best regards,

Sheng

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
>Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12:45 PM
>To: Softwires WG
>Subject: [Softwires] Confirming way forward with MAP-T and 4rd
>
>Hi all,
>  During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to
>determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the
>sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed
>standard stateless solution. There was also general agreement in the
>room to continue working on MAP-T and 4rd as experimental/informational
>specifications. After the meeting, there has also been some uncertainty
>as to the order in which the different drafts would progress from the wg,
>
>This call is being initiated to confirm two things:
>
>a) whether there is WG consensus towards continuing working on MAP-T and
>4rd as experimental documents.
>b) whether there is WG consensus that MAP-E should be progressed to
>working group last call & IESG review before MAP-T and 4rd.**
>
>Please state whether or not you're in favor of each of these decisions
>by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also
>(re)state your objections in your response.
>
>The call will complete at midnight EDT on 2012-10-05.
>
>Regards
>Suresh & Yong
>
>* Questions are available at
>
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf
>
>** Note that work on MAP-T and 4rd can proceed in parallel with MAP-E
>and we are not aiming to freeze work on these drafts. They just will not
>be progressed from the WG before MAP-E is progressed. This is to ensure
>that the drafts do not end up competing for the available (finite)
>review cycles.
>_______________________________________________
>Softwires mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to