Dear all,
I'm in favor of both.
Best Regards!
Qi Sun
From: Suresh Krishnan
Date: 2012-09-25 12:45
To: Softwires WG
Subject: [Softwires] Confirming way forward with MAP-T and 4rd
Hi all,
During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to
determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the
sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed
standard stateless solution. There was also general agreement in the
room to continue working on MAP-T and 4rd as experimental/informational
specifications. After the meeting, there has also been some uncertainty
as to the order in which the different drafts would progress from the wg,
This call is being initiated to confirm two things:
a) whether there is WG consensus towards continuing working on MAP-T and
4rd as experimental documents.
b) whether there is WG consensus that MAP-E should be progressed to
working group last call & IESG review before MAP-T and 4rd.**
Please state whether or not you're in favor of each of these decisions
by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also
(re)state your objections in your response.
The call will complete at midnight EDT on 2012-10-05.
Regards
Suresh & Yong
* Questions are available at
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf
** Note that work on MAP-T and 4rd can proceed in parallel with MAP-E
and we are not aiming to freeze work on these drafts. They just will not
be progressed from the WG before MAP-E is progressed. This is to ensure
that the drafts do not end up competing for the available (finite)
review cycles.
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
