On 2012/11/13, at 18:26, Leaf yeh <[email protected]> wrote: > '4over6' could be DS-Lite 2.0, which may also embrace MAP-E; '4via6' could > be a better name for MAP-T in the same logic below. :-) >
You may write a draft to propose it. ;) --satoru > > Best Regards, > Leaf > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Satoru Matsushima [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:10 PM > To: Leaf yeh > Cc: Satoru Matsushima; Qiong; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP-E 1:1 for HA > > On 2012/11/13, at 17:01, Leaf yeh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I guess '4over6' sounds a better name for the solution whether it has >> IPv6(A) mapping for IPv4(A+P) or not. >> >> > > Do you suggest DS-Lite should change its name to 4over6 too? > --satoru > > >> Best Regards, >> Leaf >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima >> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:07 PM >> To: Qiong >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP-E 1:1 for HA >> >> Qiong, >> >> On 2012/11/13, at 12:57, Qiong <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 agree. >>> >>> If there is no "mapping with addressing and port" at all, how can it still >>> be called MAP anymore ? >> >> It is conventional naming. Even DS-Lite has mapping with address and port. >> Please keep discussion constructively. >> --satoru >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
