Ole, By the way... I think, you should NOT use 1.1.1.1 as example.
1/8 is not a document prefix nor private address space but global space which belongs to APNIC. Cheers, Shin Miyakawa From: Ole Trøan <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP-E 1:1 for HA Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:46:03 +0100 >> [Yuchi] Actually there is a 'binding' table on the AFTR, which maintains >> matching between v4 A+P and v6 A, and there's no 'mapping with address and >> port' in DS-Lite or Lw4over6 as in MAP. The main point here is not about the >> literal difference between 'binding' and 'mapping', but the difference >> between decoupling v4 & v6 and coupling v4 & v6. > > let us assume we have a 1.1.1.0/24 for address sharing available with 256 > ports per user. > > in MAP 1:1 you'd have: > 1.1.1.1:01/40 -> 2001:db8::1 > 1.1.1.1:02/40 -> 2001:db8::2 > 1.1.1.1:03/40 -> 2001:db8::3 > . > . > . > > 64K rules. > > in MAP aggregated mode you have: > 1.1.1.0/24 -> 2001:db8:XXXX::/48 > > can you please show how the LW46 rules / binding /mapping whatever you call > them look like for 1:1 mode? > > cheers, > Ole > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
