Dear Suresh, all, With all due respect to the authors of this draft, I really think this document should not move forward.
The feature described in this draft can be easily integrated in the current unified CPE effort (binding mode: MAP1:1/Lw4over6) or the document needs to be extended to cover the port restriction feature. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Suresh Krishnan >Envoyé : lundi 17 décembre 2012 05:34 >À : Softwires WG >Cc : Yong Cui; Ralph Droms >Objet : [Softwires] Second working group last call for >draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-04 > >Hi all, > This message starts a second softwire working group last call on >advancing the draft about providing Public IPv4 over IPv6 >Access Network >as a Standards Track RFC. The authors believe that this version has >addressed the issues raised during the previous WGLC. The draft >is available at > >http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-04.txt >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-04 > >Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for advancing >this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial >suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. The chairs >will send in >their comments as well during the last call period. This last call will >conclude on January 4, 2013. > >Regards, >Suresh & Yong > >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
