Dear Suresh, I support this document to move forward. This version has solved all the technical issues, and it is quite simple for some specific use case. I think it is ready to move forward :)
Merry Christmas and Happy new year ! Qiong On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Suresh Krishnan < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > This message starts a second softwire working group last call on > advancing the draft about providing Public IPv4 over IPv6 Access Network > as a Standards Track RFC. The authors believe that this version has > addressed the issues raised during the previous WGLC. The draft > is available at > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-04.txt > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-04 > > Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for advancing > this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial > suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. The chairs will send in > their comments as well during the last call period. This last call will > conclude on January 4, 2013. > > Regards, > Suresh & Yong > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > -- ============================================== Qiong Sun China Telecom Beijing Research Institude Open source code: lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/* PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/ * ===============================================
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
