On 28/01/2013 4:26 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
Tom,
The examples in my previous note sort of provided backing for my view that the
MAP endpoint IPv6 prefix can be limited to a maximum of a /64, thus making the
IID fully conformant both to RFC 4291 and to RFC 6052.
...
I think limiting the prefix length to 64 bits is reasonable. Comments?
I don't think that's reasonable.
and I don't see what it buys us, given that supporting prefix lengths longer
than 64 is simple.
IPv6 isn't classfull, there isn't anything magic with the 64 boundary. ;-)
cheers,
Ole
OK, then I agree with Rémi. Drop mention of prefixes greater than 64
bits long and leave it to the reader to judge whether RFC 4291 imposes a
limit.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
