Remi, [...]
>>> - And to the IPv4 address if the prefix is longer than /68? >> >> it gets overwritten by the prefix, isn't that what the text says? > > Partially overwritten, yes, thus creating confusion, for no known reason to > justify it. > I wonder what use of the IPv4 address could one imagine in this case? no, fully overwritten. >>> - ... >>> >>> Of course, if a use case is provided where MAP-E would be actually used >>> with an IID shorter than 64 bits, it should be discussed. But: >>> - There is no such use case so far. >>> - Looking for one doesn't seem useful. >> >> huh? >> provider wants to deploy with a prefix length of 128? single tunnel end >> point address. isn't that obvious? > > Obvious, no! > > Could you please complete an example with a CE address and its BMR? BMR: Rule IPv6 prefix: 2001:db8::1/128 Rule IPv4 prefix: 1.1.1.1/32 EA-bits length: 0 MAP IPv6 address 2001:db8::1. cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
