> I see a useful work here that brings together the different Softwire > approaches under a unified CPE and would that's why vote for an adoption as > WG working item.
yes, I agree with that. while I think the document needs some more polishing, I do think it is something we should work on. cheers, Ole > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im > Auftrag von Suresh Krishnan > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2013 06:29 > An: Softwires WG > Cc: Yong Cui; Ralph Droms > Betreff: [Softwires] Call for adoption of draft-bfmk-softwire-unified-cpe-02 > > Hi all, > This draft was a result of the discussion initiated at the softwire meeting > in Atlanta to attempt to come up with a unified CPE specification that can > work with both MAP and lw4o6. This call is being initiated to determine > whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of > draft-bfmk-softwire-unified-cpe-02 as a softwire WG draft. Please state > whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this email. If > you are not in favor, please also state your objections in your response. > This adoption call will complete on 2013-02-18. > > Regards > Suresh & Yong > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
