> But there has been a firm requirement in the WG that, even for shared
> addresses, one of the CE could have the well-known ports.
> The WKPs-authorized option has been added to 4rd to satisfy this requirement.
> I don't think this requirement has disappeared.
does anyone in the working group have an opinion on the well-known ports and
shared IPv4 addresses?
the options we have are:
a) if well-known ports are required then a full IPv4 address must be assigned
b) allow that one user gets the well-known addresses,
but then the port block must at least be > 1024 ports.
do we know that end users only need ports 0-1023 or 0-4095?
or are the ports the require to be opened inbound across the range?
I'm leaning towards a.
cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
