I support (a). On 05/02/2013 8:38 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
But there has been a firm requirement in the WG that, even for shared addresses, one of the CE could have the well-known ports. The WKPs-authorized option has been added to 4rd to satisfy this requirement. I don't think this requirement has disappeared.does anyone in the working group have an opinion on the well-known ports and shared IPv4 addresses? the options we have are: a) if well-known ports are required then a full IPv4 address must be assigned b) allow that one user gets the well-known addresses, but then the port block must at least be > 1024 ports. do we know that end users only need ports 0-1023 or 0-4095? or are the ports the require to be opened inbound across the range? I'm leaning towards a. cheers, Ole
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
