2013-02-15 12:16, "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <[email protected]> :
> Remi, > > The question Ole posed still stands: > - what does "remove MAP 1:1 mode mean"? This question was in Ole's answer to Med saying he is "in favour of removing MAP1:1 section" (ref. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg05182). But Med's request was already perfectly clear. (I just noted that, for consistency, removal of examples 4 and 5 of Appendix A goes with that of section 7.4.) Since consensus to have this section never exited, the editor should remove it *before WGLC*. (Editors must AFAIK remain neutral.) Regards, RD > On 15/02/2013 12:06, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote: ... >> It is thus clear that, if section 7.4 and examples 4 and 5 are deleted >> from the MAP draft, *no more text* is NEEDED in the draft itself. >> >> Applicability of MAP and of other solutions to 1:1 can be clarified in >> some other document(s) when consensus is reached. >> >> Thanks, >> RD >> _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
