Good catch, indeed. Needs to be updated. Cheers, Rajiv
Sent from my Phone On Mar 8, 2013, at 4:58 PM, "Poscic, Kristian (Kristian)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think the following needs to be corrected in the softwire-map draft: MAP Configuration For a given MAP domain, the BR and CE MUST be configured with the following MAP elements. The configured values for these elements are identical for all CEs and BRs within a given MAP domain. o The End-User IPv6 prefix (Part of the normal IPv6 provisioning). o The Basic Mapping Rule and optionally the Forwarding Mapping Rules, including the Rule IPv6 prefix, Rule IPv4 prefix, and Length of EA bits o The IPv6 address of the MAP BR. o Hub and spoke mode or Mesh mode. (If all traffic should be sent to the BR, or if direct CE to CE traffic should be supported). The end-user IPv6 prefix is not identical for all CEs. On the contrary, it must be unique per CE. For example uniqueness is reflected in EA bits in case of shared IPv4 address. Kris. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
