Sure. That will work. -----Original Message----- From: Ole Troan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:52 AM To: Poscic, Kristian (Kristian) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Softwires] softwire-map-04
Kris, > I think the following needs to be corrected in the softwire-map draft: > > MAP Configuration > > For a given MAP domain, the BR and CE MUST be configured with the > following MAP elements. The configured values for these elements are > identical for all CEs and BRs within a given MAP domain. > > o The End-User IPv6 prefix (Part of the normal IPv6 provisioning). > > o The Basic Mapping Rule and optionally the Forwarding Mapping > Rules, including the Rule IPv6 prefix, Rule IPv4 prefix, and > Length of EA bits > > o The IPv6 address of the MAP BR. > > o Hub and spoke mode or Mesh mode. (If all traffic should be sent > to the BR, or if direct CE to CE traffic should be supported). > > > The end-user IPv6 prefix is not identical for all CEs. On the contrary, it > must be unique per CE. For example uniqueness is reflected in EA bits in case > of shared IPv4 address. I have read through section 7 again, and I think that we can remove the first bullet. the requirement for the End-User prefix is described separately already in 7.1 is that acceptable as a resolution to you? Best regards, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
