Re-, Thanks for clarifying Ted. I must admit this is not what I understood when I read draft-scskf-*.
Does the same conclusion applies also for lw-4over6? (I'm naively assuming, given the approach defined in draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe, the same dhcpv6 to configure MAP will also be used lw-4over6) Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Ted Lemon [mailto:[email protected]] >Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2013 16:39 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN >Cc : Qi Sun; [email protected]; Softwires ([email protected]) >Objet : Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 > >On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:27 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you saying MAP is not a concerned with this draft and dhcpv6 can be >used for MAP? > >For configuring the MAP-E prefix and port set, yes. That was the >discussion we had in Softwires in Orlando: cover the easy stuff with DHCPv6 >(this is the existing DHCPv6 MAP option), and then if someone needs legacy >IPv4 services or stateful address allocation, do it with DHCPv4-over- >DHCPv6. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
