Hi Ian, Thanks for the clarification. I understood from your answer: dhcpv6 will be used for both MAP and lw4over6 and both don't require draft-scskf-* for IP address + port provisioning.
Given currently no additional dhcpv4 only options is required for any of the solutions we are discussing in softwire, I do still think it is not justified to take on a solution for a problem which may not exist. draft-scskf-* proposal can be revived when there is a real need to support dhcpv4-only options. No? Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2013 16:56 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN; [email protected] >Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >Objet : Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4- >over-dhcpv6 > >Hi Med, > >It would still work for lw-4o6 and the unified CPE. All of the basic >params for configuring lw4o6/MAP1:1 can be provisioned through the >OPTION_MAP_BIND that is proposed in the unified CPE draft over DHCPv6. >Additional DHCPv4 only options would be done via the DHCPv4oDHCPv6 method >for both lw4o6 and MAP-E. > >We still need to agree on which option will be used for provisioning the >address of the lwAFTR/MAP BR, however. There was some discussion on this >on the SW ML last week, but no conclusion reached. > > >Cheers, >Ian > >On 15/04/2013 16:47, "[email protected]" ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>Re-, >> >>Thanks for clarifying Ted. I must admit this is not what I understood >>when I read draft-scskf-*. >> >>Does the same conclusion applies also for lw-4over6? (I'm naively >>assuming, given the approach defined in draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe, >>the same dhcpv6 to configure MAP will also be used lw-4over6) >> >>Cheers, >>Med >> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : Ted Lemon [mailto:[email protected]] >>>Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2013 16:39 >>>À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN >>>Cc : Qi Sun; [email protected]; Softwires ([email protected]) >>>Objet : Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 >>> >>>On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:27 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Are you saying MAP is not a concerned with this draft and dhcpv6 can be >>>used for MAP? >>> >>>For configuring the MAP-E prefix and port set, yes. That was the >>>discussion we had in Softwires in Orlando: cover the easy stuff with >>>DHCPv6 >>>(this is the existing DHCPv6 MAP option), and then if someone needs >>>legacy >>>IPv4 services or stateful address allocation, do it with DHCPv4-over- >>>DHCPv6. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Softwires mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
