+1 support. Thanks!

Best wishes
Qiong


On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:52 AM, GangChen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Support
> This interactive radius support for MAP is useful when it comes to
> real deployment. ISPs are likely use radius to authorize and manage
> MAP subscribers.
>
> BRs
>
> Gang
>
> 2013/5/24, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>:
> > Hi all,
> >   This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
> > consensus towards adoption of draft-jiang-softwire-map-radius-04 as a
> > softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the
> > adoption by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also
> > state your objections in your response. The call will complete at
> > midnight PDT on 2013-06-02.
> >
> > Regards
> > Suresh & Yong
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Softwires mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>



-- 
==============================================
Qiong Sun
China Telecom Beijing Research Institude


Open source code:
lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/*
PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/ *
===============================================
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to