+1 supported as co-author. It is important to standardize the Radius protocol for MAP information also from the point of view as vendors. It make sense to implement the unified protocol as different vendors for interoperation problem.
Cheers Yu -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of GangChen Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:53 AM To: Suresh Krishnan Cc: Softwires WG; Yong Cui Subject: Re: [Softwires] Call for adoption of draft-jiang-softwire-map-radius-04 as wg draft Support This interactive radius support for MAP is useful when it comes to real deployment. ISPs are likely use radius to authorize and manage MAP subscribers. BRs Gang 2013/5/24, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG > consensus towards adoption of draft-jiang-softwire-map-radius-04 as a > softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the > adoption by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also > state your objections in your response. The call will complete at > midnight PDT on 2013-06-02. > > Regards > Suresh & Yong > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
