Wojciech, > You're apparently missing some key points:
that's not uncommon. ;-) > 1. It's a functional requirement of a CPE, specifying how the CPE behaves > with a case of NOT having an IPv4 address. What is the to be the bahviour of > a MAP CPE without one? just like if it didn't get an IPv4 address on native Ethernet. > 2. This is NOT about configuring a ds-lite CPE my understanding was that the CPE had to be provisioned for this mode, possibly as a separate MAP domain. and that the BR must also act as a CGN. > Throughout, its still not been answered what is the downside of having this > functionality of a *MAP CPE*? it adds yet another variant. what's wrong with provisioning the DS-lite option when you want this behaviour? or if you want overflow from MAP to DS-lite? I don't get the benefit of what you are suggesting. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
