On 25 November 2013 19:13, Simon Perreault <[email protected]>wrote:
> Le 25/11/2013 04:39, Wojciech Dec a écrit : > > Throughout, its still not been answered what is the downside of having >> this functionality of a *MAP CPE*? >> > > We've been told many times that operators don't want a zillion different > ways of doing the same thing. This WG in particular has often been the > target of such comments. We need to do something about it. IMHO this is one > instance of duplication that can easily be eliminated. > How is describing the behaviour of a MAP CPE that has the IPv6 address of a BR, but not an IPv4 address the duplication of anything? Could you perhaps also stick to non-rhetorical answers. Wojciech. > > Simon >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
