All, I re-read the draft carefully. I noticed two issues:
1. Section 5.1:
An IPv6 address from an assigned prefix is also required for the lwB4 to use as the encapsulation source address for the softwire. In order to enable end-to-end provisioning, the IPv6 address is constructed by taking the /64 prefix assigned to the WAN interface
What happens if there is more than one prefixes assigned to the WAN interface?
If that case results in undefined behaviour (fine by me), it needs to be stated in the text.
2. See other mails about section 5.2.1. And a minor suggestion:
The DNS considerations described in Section 5.5 and Section 6.4 of [RFC6333] SHOULD be followed.
This SHOULD is suspicious. Suggestion: s/SHOULD be followed/also apply/ Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
