Dear all, I support advancing this document. It is being deployed in some networks.
Thank you, Tina -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 [email protected] 发送时间: 2014年1月24日 16:10 收件人: [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: Re: [Softwires] Working group last call for draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-03 > >NEW: > An IPv6 address from an assigned prefix is also required for the lwB4 > to use as the encapsulation source address for the softwire. In > order to enable end-to-end provisioning, the IPv6 address is > constructed by taking a /64 prefix assigned to the WAN interface > and suffixing 64-bits for the interface identifier. As there may be > multiple WAN prefixes, of which only one can be used for lw4o6, the > CPE is provisioned with the knowledge of which one to take. The /128 > prefix is then constructed as follows: [ian] I think that reads better. Can I suggest a slight wording tweak?: s/knowledge of which one to take/logic to select the correct one Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
