>> I know this is a political rather than a technical point, but one could sort >> of reverse the claim and suggest that if 1:1 mode is desired, LW4o6 is the >> better way to go. > > Indeed, if all one needs is 1:1, one might prefer lw4over6 since it only has > the one mode.
I think the point he was trying to make was that it isn't optimal to have two standards documents, specifying mechanisms where one is almost completely encompassed by the other. I say almost, because there might be some divergence in how tunnel endpoint addresses are used, and how fragmentation and ICMP is dealt with. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
