On Feb 25, 2014, at 6:11 PM, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the point he was trying to make was that it isn't optimal to have two 
> standards documents, specifying mechanisms where one is almost completely 
> encompassed by the other. I say almost, because there might be some 
> divergence in how tunnel endpoint addresses are used, and how fragmentation 
> and ICMP is dealt with.

If this is indeed his point, I'm sure we're all sympathetic (I know I am) but 
it's not actionable, so we should move on.

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to