Dear all, There's no IPR issue that I'm aware of. Thanks!
Best regards! Yuchi Chen 2015-03-14 10:34 GMT+08:00 Yong Cui <[email protected]>: > Hi authors, > > We would like to advance the document. > Would you please update your document according to the following "Check > nits" report once the submission system opens? I found there are still some > issues in your new version draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-08. > > > http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-08.txt > > I would also need to receive the confirmation to the chairs from each of > your authors on the IPR issue: > Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures > required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have > already been filed. If not, explain why? > > Thanks in advance, > > Yong > > On 2015-2-9, at 上午10:44, Fuyu (Eleven) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Tom > > > > Yes. I have updated the DS-Lite MIB based on > draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib. > > Your review and comments will be very appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > > > BR > > Yu > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom > Taylor > > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:34 AM > > To: Yong Cui; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07 > > > > I finally got around to looking at this document, but I see I'm a bit > late. In any event, I believe the authors are updating it based on the fact > that [I-D.ietf-behave-nat-mib] is being replaced by > draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib. I will be happy to review the updated > draft, because coordination between the two drafts is clearly required. > > > > Tom Taylor > > > > On 21/01/2015 7:05 AM, Yong Cui wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on > >> advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC. > >> > >> After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02, > >> there were some major comments. The authors have revised the document > >> including the structure and detailed technical contents. > >> Now the authors believe that this version has addressed all the > >> issues. > >> > >> The latest version of the draft is available at: > >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07.txt > >> > >> Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for > >> advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. > >> Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last > >> call will conclude on February 3, 2015. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Yong & Suresh > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Softwires mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
