I finally got around to looking at this document, but I see I'm a bit
late. In any event, I believe the authors are updating it based on the
fact that [I-D.ietf-behave-nat-mib] is being replaced by
draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib. I will be happy to review the updated
draft, because coordination between the two drafts is clearly required.
Tom Taylor
On 21/01/2015 7:05 AM, Yong Cui wrote:
Hi folks,
This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on
advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC.
After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02,
there were some major comments. The authors have revised the
document including the structure and detailed technical contents.
Now the authors believe that this version has addressed all the
issues.
The latest version of the draft is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07.txt
Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for
advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This
last call will conclude on February 3, 2015.
Thanks,
Yong & Suresh
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
