Dear Ben, Thank you for the comment. We will make these sentences clearer:
- section 5.1, first two sentences: The text can be interpreted to mean the subtree is the mechanism for that negotiation. I assume that's not the intent? [Jiang] The subtree is not responsible for negotiation. We will revise the statement. -5.1, last sentence: I don't understand; what different tunnel? [Jiang] We want to explain that the encapsulation information (e.g., L2TPv3 Session ID, GRE Key, etc.) is not managed in the softwire mesh MIB. We will revise the statement. -8, paragraph 6: Do the 2119 keywords in this paragaph represent new requirements specified in this draft, or do they describe existing requirements from SNMPv3? If the latter, please use descriptive language rather than 2119 keywords. [Jiang] These are some requirements specified in this draft. Thank you! Best regards, Jiang Dong 2015-12-02 1:05 GMT+02:00 Ben Campbell <[email protected]>: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-mib-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-mib/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - section 5.1, first two sentences: > The text can be interpreted to mean the subtree is the mechanism for that > negotiation. I assume that's not the intent? > > -5.1, last sentence: > I don't understand; what different tunnel? > > -8, paragraph 6: > Do the 2119 keywords in this paragaph represent new requirements > specified in this draft, or do they describe existing requirements from > SNMPv3? If the latter, please use descriptive language rather than 2119 > keywords. > > -5.1, Third sentence: > Missing article before "Softwire mesh framework...". > > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
