Hi Linhui, > > 4) The usage of choice statement is not very clear, why do we need to use > > the 'case' and 'feature' statements together? It seems that we only need > > one of them. > > [if - Well, a CE may implement binding and/or algorithm. If it implements > one, then there is no choice to be made. If it implements both, then it can > only configure one type hence the choice. If it needed to implement two types > for whatever reason, then there would be two instances of the model attached > to different interfaces. > [LH]: That sounds strange, why not just restricting the CE/BR instance (not > the actual device) to be only one of them (i.e. binding & algorithm)? In this > way, only 'if-feature' is needed.
Can you provide a (high level) example of how you would structure this? Thanks, Ian
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
