Does this means that I should not expect more ideas, comments or discussions from these WGs regarding the next version of IPmix?!
Khaled -----Original Message----- From: Bob Hinden [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:53 PM To: Khaled Omar <[email protected]> Cc: Bob Hinden <[email protected]>; [email protected]; IPv6 List <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> Subject: Re: IPmix I-D version 01. Khaled, The 6man working group chairs think a discussion of IPmix is out of scope for the [email protected] list (and suspect the same for v6ops list as well). We request that the you not send email on this topic to these lists and anyone responding remove these lists from the cc:. Thanks, Bob & Ole > On Nov 13, 2018, at 6:40 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Your feedback will be appreciated for the submitted version of the IPmix I-D. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipmix/ > > > > Regards, > > > > Khaled Omar > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
