I hope there will be a discussion somewhere else. Khaled
Best Regards Khaled Omar ________________________________ From: Bob Hinden <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 10:09:51 PM To: Khaled Omar Cc: Bob Hinden; [email protected]; IPv6 List; [email protected]; Suresh Krishnan Subject: Re: IPmix I-D version 01. Khaled, > On Nov 14, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this means that I should not expect more ideas, comments or discussions > from these WGs regarding the next version of IPmix?! If there is more discussion, it should be somewhere else. Not on the IPv6 list. Bob > > Khaled > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Hinden [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 8:53 PM > To: Khaled Omar <[email protected]> > Cc: Bob Hinden <[email protected]>; [email protected]; IPv6 List > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Suresh Krishnan > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: IPmix I-D version 01. > > Khaled, > > The 6man working group chairs think a discussion of IPmix is out of scope for > the [email protected] list (and suspect the same for v6ops list as well). We > request that the you not send email on this topic to these lists and anyone > responding remove these lists from the cc:. > > Thanks, > Bob & Ole > > > >> On Nov 13, 2018, at 6:40 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Your feedback will be appreciated for the submitted version of the IPmix I-D. >> >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipmix/ >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Khaled Omar >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> [email protected] >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
