roughly the same, 80/110 has less side wall and more tread dome for the same
width, basically they are kinda low profile tyres.
80/ good on front and back or just front with a 90/ rear, if you do a 90/ fr
+ 80/ bk the bike will handle like a pig with thin wheels, not so much a
problem on modern bikes as they are quite wide.
hope that helps mate,
cheers
slade
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fletchb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "slade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Multiple recipients of list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: Metric tire recommendations for 400F ?


> I have a 3.50 rear tire and I don't know how to convert to metric so
> between a 90/100 and 80/110 which is a wider tire?
>
> Thanks for the reply,
> Fletch
>
>
> slade wrote:
>
> >hi folks, cant see what all the fuss is about modern tyres fit perfectly
to
> >our Hondas with superior road holding ability, my personal preference is
> >Bridgestone BT45 in winter and BT39 in summer, make of tyre is a personal
> >thing as most tyres these days do the same job to the same standard.
> >tyre sizes are
> >18x3.00 to 3.25 = 18 x 90/90 or 80/100
> >18x3.50 to 3.75 = 18 x 90/100 or 80/110
> >18x4.00 to 4,25 = 18 x 90/110 or 80/120
> >
> >the 400f should have:
> >fr = 90/90 or 80/100
> >bk = 90/110 or 80/120 (90/100 is fine if you have trouble getting the
normal
> >size)
> >
> >hope that helps
> >cheers
> >slade
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Fletchb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Multiple recipients of list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 5:17 AM
> >Subject: Metric tire recommendations for 400F ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Need a new rear tire for my 400. I want to try a more modern tire . I
> >>have been running IRC's as that's what came with the bike but they don't
> >>last and don't grip (had a close call last friday because of that)
> >>What is a metric equlivent ? I would like a slightly larger tire. Told
> >>metzler is a good tire, any thoughts?
> >>
> >>Thanks and regards,
> >>Fletch
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to