Does this mean that someone has to send a join request for multicast
forwarding too?
so if i give a join request on the 10x.x.x port, the server will start
forwarding the packets?
regards.
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Multicast routing on solaris 9 (siddharth bhosle)
2. quick easy question: how to tell amont of ram installed?
(Leonardo Lagos)
3. Re: Re: [Solaris-Users] Multicast routing on solaris 9
(Mahavir Shah)
4. Re: quick easy question: how to tell amont of ram (Darren Dunham)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:44:08 +0530
From: siddharth bhosle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Solaris-Users] Multicast routing on solaris 9
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
hello,
yes, my 10.x.x.x card is up, if that is what you are asking.
And, no, my multicast is still not workinng.
regards
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
hi
have u made up ur 10.x.x.x
siddharth bhosle wrote:
I have a solaris 9 system on Sparc. I am using it as a router between
my 10.x.x.x network and the 192.x.x.x network.
I am multicasting content from servers on 192 network to clients on
the 10 network.
My solaris system shows both interfaces enabled for MULTICAST and the
route for multicasting, namely,
224.0.0.0/4 is also shown in `netstat -nr` with 10. interface as the
gateway.
When I snoop, I can see it receiving packets on the 192 interface but
nothing goes out the 10 network.
What am i doing wrong?
If there are routers on the 10 dot network you might have to configure
them to forward Join and Leave commands that are generated from the
endsystems. But setting that issue aside for a moment, you first should
check that your endsystems are in fact sending IGMP Join commands. I
don't recall what those packets look like but most packet sniffers (i'm
thinking of ethereal in particular) can detect them. So that's the first
question: Does your sniffer see IGMP Join packets? The second question
is: Can you determine that those packets are indeed getting into the 192
dot network or at least as far as the 192 interface?
-- TT
***********************Confidentiality Notice***************************
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Divinet or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments.
************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Solaris-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
